Description: regression, PDF export Steps to Reproduce: 1.open attached file 2.export to PDF Actual Results: Wrong export of blue shapes. Expected Results: correct export Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: .
Created attachment 199070 [details] test file
This seems to have begun at the below commit in bibisect repository/OS linux-64-25.8. Adding Cc: to Patrick Luby ; Could you possibly take a look at this one? Thanks 29abdb9214ca93af5bac8effc1cb89bb37c272d8 is the first bad commit commit 29abdb9214ca93af5bac8effc1cb89bb37c272d8 Author: Jenkins Build User <tdf@maggie.tdf> Date: Sat Jan 25 20:17:32 2025 +0100 source 5e03f4d40c14cc79b1f3f790955196a31eec5d3c 180746: tdf#164223 invert alpha mask for JPEG images | https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/180746
Confirm with Version: 25.8.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 4cd88c0534e11b8357f15428deb0ee52689cb7d5 CPU threads: 16; OS: Linux 6.8; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: ro-RO (ro_RO.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded Was good in Version: 25.2.0.3 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: e1cf4a87eb02d755bce1a01209907ea5ddc8f069 CPU threads: 16; OS: Linux 6.8; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: ro-RO (ro_RO.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded
I have uploaded the following revert of the fix for tdf#164223: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/181291 Interestingly, tdf#164223 is still fixed after reverting so I assume that some of @Noel's recent work fixed that bug elsewhere in the code. I'll commit the above patch as soon as it passes automated testing, but the next question is does either this bug or tdf#164223 occur in the 24.8 or 25.2 nightly builds (I had backported the fix for tdf#164223 to both branches)? If so, let me know and I can backport the revert before either of those branches are in an official release.
(In reply to Patrick (volunteer) from comment #4) > I'll commit the above patch as soon as it passes automated testing, but the > next question is does either this bug or tdf#164223 occur in the 24.8 or > 25.2 nightly builds (I had backported the fix for tdf#164223 to both > branches)? If so, let me know and I can backport the revert before either of > those branches are in an official release. Looks like the linux_clang_debug build is broken due to some Java tests so commit will have to wait until someone resolves that. I have rebuilt locally with libreoffice-24-8 and libreoffice-24-8-5 and reverting the patch in both of those not only fixes this bug, but also tdf#164223 so I have submitted reverts for both branches. Working on libreoffice-25-2 and libreoffice-25-2-1 branches next.
(In reply to Patrick (volunteer) from comment #5) > Working on libreoffice-25-2 and libreoffice-25-2-1 branches next. OK. Rebuilt both of the above branches and reverting fixes both this bug and tdf#164223 so revert patches uploaded to both branches. So now there are 5 patches awaiting commit. Once those are committed, the bad commit for tdf#164223 shouldn't be included in any upcoming releases.
*** Bug 165176 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
I confirmed that the fix is in LibreOffic 25.2.1: Version: 25.2.1.2 (AARCH64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: d3abf4aee5fd705e4a92bba33a32f40bc4e56f49 CPU threads: 8; OS: macOS 15.3.1; UI render: Skia/Metal; VCL: osx Locale: en-CA (en_CA.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded