Description: I've seen a news that Rocky Linux added support for RISC-V architecture, since then, it's reasonable to provide RISC-V builds as well. Steps to Reproduce: N/A Actual Results: N/A Expected Results: N/A Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: https://alternativeto.net/news/2025/6/rocky-linux-10-drops-support-for-32-bit-applications-and-adds-risc-v-architecture-support/
https://www.phoronix.com/news/LibreOffice-RISC-V-64-bit-Build https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libreoffice As far as I can tell, that's not a question for LibreOffice, but for the distro packages.
(In reply to Volga from comment #0) > I've seen a news that Rocky Linux added support for RISC-V architecture, > since then, it's reasonable to provide RISC-V builds as well. Even with adjusted title, the request completely lacks any reasoning. "I've seen someone did something; therefore, it suddenly became reasonable for TDF to spend substantial resources to providing packages for a particular architecture (but not others)". Why? What that event means from the point of view of user demand for TDF-built packages (as opposed to distro-provided ones, which are the officially preferred method [1])? What does Rocky Linux has to do with that? What is the analysis that requires providing for exactly that architecture? [1] https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/install-howto/linux/ : "As a general rule, you are advised to install LibreOffice via the installation methods recommended by your particular Linux distribution"