Bug 168013 - Cannot set SUBTOTAL cell range in advance
Summary: Cannot set SUBTOTAL cell range in advance
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Calc (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
25.8.0.0 alpha0+
Hardware: All All
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: bibisected, bisected, regression
: 168218 168539 169826 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks: Function-Subtotal
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2025-08-19 15:47 UTC by Dmytro Kolesnykov
Modified: 2026-01-30 12:09 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Dmytro Kolesnykov 2025-08-19 15:47:18 UTC
Description:
I used to use formulas like =SUBTOTAL(9;G5:G99999) and =SUM(G5:G99999) to count all amounts in column, with and without filters, respectively. Using row number 99999 might look ambiguous, but it's just "somewhere far far away, definitely below the end", and it was working well--until now.

After update to 25.8 release, LibreOffice Calc always automatically changes my =SUBTOTAL(9;G5:G99999) formulas to something like =SUBTOTAL(9;G5:G6512) where 6512 is the last row number on the sheet. Thus, after adding next row, I have to change the range by hand. That is super annoying, broke existing sheets and is not error-proof.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Start with empty sheet
2. Put some numbers to cells A2, A3, A4, A5 (e.g., 10, 20, 30, 40)
3. Put formula =SUBTOTAL(9;A1:A99999) to cell A1

Actual Results:
The formula in A1 is changed to =SUBTOTAL(9;A2:A5)

Expected Results:
The formula in A1 should be =SUBTOTAL(9;A2:A99999)


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No

Additional Info:
Fortunately, =SUM(A2:A99999) behavior is not affected
Comment 1 Jesus Solis 2025-08-20 22:24:58 UTC
Can reproduce. Setting to "NEW".

Version: 26.2.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: fd48da7236f26d9d8d16759546a5c860f91b82de
CPU threads: 12; OS: Linux 6.14; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Calc: CL threaded
Comment 2 nobu 2025-09-25 01:22:31 UTC
*** Bug 168539 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 nobu 2025-12-05 06:39:48 UTC
*** Bug 168218 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 nobu 2025-12-05 06:40:06 UTC
*** Bug 169826 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Saburo 2026-01-30 12:09:56 UTC
bibisected with linux-64-25.8
commit b89047a0f0100fb30121084cf42815aa792c1f88
author	Balazs Varga

tdf#164843 - sc optimize "SubTotal" function's reference ranges

Double references from relative named ranges can point to large
ranges (MAXCOL/MAXROW) and because of that some function evaluation
like SubTotal can be extreamly slow when we call ScTable::CompileHybridFormula
with these large ranges. Since all the SubTotal functions ignore empty cells
its worth to optimize and trim the double references in SubTotal functions.

***
adding CC: Balazs Varga
Please, take a look?