Bug 45897 - Writer FILESAVE: validation of odt not passed: Document root element "math", must match DOCTYPE root "null"
Summary: Writer FILESAVE: validation of odt not passed: Document root element "math", ...
Status: RESOLVED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Formula Editor (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
3.5.0 RC2
Hardware: All All
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard: odf odf_validation
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-02-10 07:24 UTC by sasha.libreoffice
Modified: 2012-09-13 11:10 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:

Attachments
test case (30.65 KB, application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text)
2012-02-10 07:24 UTC, sasha.libreoffice 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description sasha.libreoffice 2012-02-10 07:24:28 UTC 
Created attachment 56876 [details]
test case

document not passed validation on http://odf-validator.rhcloud.com/
errors is:
math_newline_issue.odt/Object 1/content.xml[2,6]: Error: Document is invalid: no grammar found.
math_newline_issue.odt/Object 1/content.xml[2,6]: Error: Document root element "math", must match DOCTYPE root "null".

used 3.6.0 master 97fdf02-9eed775-f061262
Comment 1 Florian Reisinger 2012-05-20 05:51:34 UTC 
IMHo this is a duplicate....

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 45895 ***
Comment 2 sasha.libreoffice 2012-05-21 02:05:06 UTC 
It is not duplicate. Bugs is completely different
Comment 3 Joel Madero 2012-09-10 20:26:51 UTC 
This looks like a dupe to me...
Comment 4 Michael Stahl (allotropia) 2012-09-13 11:10:58 UTC 
hmm that "no grammar found" error sounds suspicious, like that validator
is missing some schema files...

LO Math doesn't appear to write a DOCTYPE into MathML documents.

quickly skimming these, it seems to me that a DOCTYPE declaration
is entirely optional for MathML documents:

http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-MathML/appendixA.html
http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML2/appendixa.html
http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML3/appendixa.html

(and i don't even know which version LO Math is supposed to support)

so based on that i'd say NOTABUG

also, this is in no way a duplicate of any other bug that i've seen.