Problem description: I copied a sheet that contains references to other sheets. If the sheet is copied immediately after the original it seems to work, but if it is copied further down the group of tabs the formulas are moving vertically, losing references, and disappearing. Steps to reproduce: 1. Created spreadsheet with references to other sheets 2. Copied sheet 3. Formulas not where they should be Current behavior: Not working Expected behavior: Working Platform (if different from the browser): Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/536.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/19.0.1084.52 Safari/536.5
Created attachment 63308 [details] Example.ods Could you attach any example documents to allow others to check on different system/build?
The behavior I was dealing with is the same as found in the following forum thread and is apparently the standard behavior for formulas referring to a cell on a different sheet when the sheet is copied. The use of absolute references is an easy resolution, but personally I find the behavior a little counter intuitive. Overall I love calc and have been using it for years at home and have been advocating a change at the company I work for, but things like this make adoption harder to argue for. When long term spreadsheet users find what appear to be problems with basic functions, it scares them off and the odds of getting a second look are slim. I'm not advocating that calc be a clone of excel by any means, as there are some things that I prefer about calc, but some things should behave in the same manner. Please keep up the good work and if there is anything I can do to help (I'm not a programmer) let me know. http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?t=47863 <http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?t=47863> Steps to reproduce problem: 1) Open attached spreadsheet 2) Copy Sheet 1 to the position after Sheet 2 3) Compare formulas between Sheet 1 and the copy (I expected them to be the same) Thanks, David On 6/21/2012 8:09 AM, bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org wrote: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50860 > > bfoman<bfo.bugmail@spamgourmet.com> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |bfo.bugmail@spamgourmet.com > > --- Comment #1 from bfoman<bfo.bugmail@spamgourmet.com> 2012-06-21 06:09:38 PDT --- > Could you attach any example documents to allow others to check on different > system/build? >
Tested in 3.6.1.2 (Windows) The formulas are not moving, but sheet references are being adjusted, when they arguably should not.
I have same problem -using version 3.5.6.2 (on Windows 7) Producing summary sheets referenced to data in 16 sheets. Arranging summary data from each sheet in rows - in the same order as sheets in file. The row order of the references become jumbled randomly but the references within the row remain the same and rest of data copies correctly (including formulas with in the rows) A problem because in my case the rows are then labelled as containing data from another sheet -just glad I realised it had happened. Copy sheet next to original works, copy in another sheet position references become jumbled. Repeated copying in same position maintains the same jumbled order, copying into another sheet position jumbles reference but in a different order. My sheet references have format =sheetname.$C$122 - changing to =$sheetname.$C$122 stops the jumbling but shift F4 does seem to add the $ to the sheet name and if this is required it should happen when you are linking to another a sheet... (sorry can't upload file as it contains personal client info)
The formular changes when copying sheets because calc treated sheet name as relative reference by default. The same happen if you copy a cell formular in sheet1 to sheet4 while the cell formular is referenced to sheet2. However, when someone is copying sheets, or copying cell formulars between sheets, no one is expecting the sheet name to be changed.Change sheet name will do only harm, no good. So, Calc should treat sheet name as absolute reference by default.
Adding 61696,43175 and 69181 to see also list. They are related.
*** Bug 69181 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Version 4.3.2.2 Same problem, when a formula with a link another sheet, when copying a sheet the formula are different.
Version field should be the earlist version the bug appears. Changing back to 3.5.3.
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.0.4 or later) https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for your help! -- The LibreOffice QA Team This NEW Message was generated on: 2015-12-20
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.1.6 or 5.2.3 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug-20170103
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 85538 ***