Bug 53302 - FORMATTING: Cell Border thickness is too big - 2.5 pts -
Summary: FORMATTING: Cell Border thickness is too big - 2.5 pts -
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 53287
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Calc (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
3.6.0.1 rc
Hardware: Other All
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard: BSA
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-08-09 17:41 UTC by Dibu Krishnan
Modified: 2012-08-21 15:51 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:

Attachments
A screen shot which explains the problem (110.22 KB, image/png)
2012-08-09 17:41 UTC, Dibu Krishnan 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Dibu Krishnan 2012-08-09 17:41:31 UTC 
Created attachment 65352 [details]
A screen shot which explains the problem

Problem description: 
Displaying cells borders too thick  when opening .xlsx files created using MSOFFICE, which makes the spreadsheet looks so ugly and difficult to work on.

No problem observed when I created a new .xlsx file using libre Calc. 

Steps to reproduce:
1. Open an existing .xlsx file which has some cells with borders.( created using MS Office 2007)
2. ....
3. ....

Current behavior:

Too thick borders for cells  (2.5 pts) when opening the file.

Expected behavior:

Should have decent cell borders as formatted before (0.05 pts thickness)

Platform (if different from the browser): 
              
Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0.1
Comment 1 Jean-Baptiste Faure 2012-08-11 08:17:47 UTC 
Please install current release of LO 3.6.0 (3.6.0.4) and try again.

Best regards. JBF
Comment 2 Michael Stahl (allotropia) 2012-08-21 15:48:09 UTC 
hmmm... with that description it looks like duplicate of 50865

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 50865 ***
Comment 3 Michael Stahl (allotropia) 2012-08-21 15:51:26 UTC 
oops too many duplicates :)

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 53287 ***