Nicholas Shanks has supplied “higher-resolution OpenDocument icons for MacOSX” with the following commit: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=0cb1b9685877f6aeaddf1088ae5008e38bade6f9 This was a nice improvement, thank you very much for it! However, the new high-resolution icon sizes, i.e. 1024x1024 px and 512x512 px, are only inside of the .icns files for the OASIS document types: oasis-database.icns oasis-drawing-template.icns oasis-drawing.icns oasis-formula.icns oasis-master-document.icns oasis-presentation-template.icns oasis-presentation.icns oasis-spreadsheet-template.icns oasis-spreadsheet.icns oasis-text-template.icns oasis-text.icns The corresponding “normal” .icns files, which look completely identical (?!), are still only containing up to 128x128 px images: drawing-template.icns drawing.icns formula.icns master-document.icns presentation-template.icns presentation.icns spreadsheet-template.icns spreadsheet.icns text-template.icns text.icns are all missing the 1024x1024 px and 512x512 px images. Tested with the last master builds for Mac OS X, e.g. LOdev 3.7.0.0.alpha0+ (build ID: c252694; pull time: 2012-10-12 22:05:41). I can also confirm this if I look at the git repository: the directory http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/tree/sysui/desktop/icons/hicolor/1024x1024/mimetypes contains only *.png images for the “oasis-...” document types, not for the “normal” ones, while e.g. the directory http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/tree/sysui/desktop/icons/hicolor/32x32/mimetypes contains *.png files both for the “oasis-...” document types and for the “normal” ones. IMHO it should be rather easy to fix this problem: the “normal” .icns files look completely identical to the corresponding OASIS ones, so just copy all missing images from the OASIS .icns files to the “normal” .icns files. Additional hints: 1) The 1024x1024 px and 512x512 px images are also missing from the “extension.icns” file (there is no corresponding “oasis-extension.icns” file). 2) There is no “database.icns” file, *only* the “oasis-database.icns” file; is this intentional, or should I file another bug report for this?
@ Nicholas Shanks: Thank you again for your higher-resolution OpenDocument icons for MacOSX! This is a bug report about some inconsistency -- some of the .icns files are containing the new high-resolution images, and others don’t. Can you please take a look at this problem? It should be really easy for you to fix this! Thank you very much! @ Emir Sarı: Given that you are interested in these icons issues, can you please check if you can confirm my bug report (by downloading the latest Master/3.7 daily build from http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ and checking the .icns files inside of the daily build at LOdev.app/Contens/Resources/ )? Then please set the status of this bug report to NEW. Thank you very much!
Confirmed under OS X 10.7 using latest daily build. Changing bug status to new.
@ Emir Sarı: > Confirmed under OS X 10.7 using latest daily build. Thank you for confirming my report!
Added to our special Mac meta bug 42082.
> However, the new high-resolution icon sizes, i.e. 1024x1024 px and 512x512 > px, are only inside of the .icns files for the OASIS document types... > > The corresponding “normal” .icns files, which look completely identical > (?!), are still only containing up to 128x128 px images: > > drawing-template.icns > drawing.icns > formula.icns > master-document.icns > presentation-template.icns > presentation.icns > spreadsheet-template.icns > spreadsheet.icns > text-template.icns > text.icns > > are all missing the 1024x1024 px and 512x512 px images. Yes, this is deliberate. I intended to make slightly altered versions for these icons that distinguished the document formats. At the moment, both icons convey the following information: 1) What media type the document contains (e.g. "presentation") 2) What application is currently assigned to open the document. I would like to add: 3) What binary format the document is saved in (and thus, convey to knowledgeable individuals what other software they might have available which can read this format through use of common icon elements). I intended to do this by means of superimposing some identifying feature from the pre-Oasis icons, such as a bird motif, onto the icons. I have yet to get around to this however, as it was not a high priority for me.
(In reply to comment #5) > Yes, this is deliberate. I intended to make slightly altered versions for > these icons that distinguished the document formats. > [...] > I intended to do this by means of superimposing some identifying feature > from the pre-Oasis icons, such as a bird motif, onto the icons. I have yet > to get around to this however, as it was not a high priority for me. Ah, thank you very much for the explanation! However: because the creation of the “slightly altered versions” has low priority (and I completely understand this!), what about if you would just copy *for now* the big icons for the OASIS document types into the icons for the “normal” document types? This would not be too laborious (I hope) and would at least restore parity between the two icon families ... The current state of affairs (big icons in the one family, but no big icons in the other one) might appear just like an error to normal users. So, just copying the icons would make LibreOffice 3.4 look “complete”, and you would have any time you may want or need to create distinguishable icons for 4.1, 4.2, ... or whatever ;-) Anyway, thank you very much for the icons!
Im new with the database features and would like to have a little help in getting an interesting start of a data base platform. could one of you please help me?
Actually it would be great if someone could just fix this as Roman explained. Creating an *even* slightly altered versions would bring inconsistency among platforms, so most logical way would be using the same icons for all file types. @Nicholas, it would be nice if you could take a look at this issue when available for you.
I have this weekend earmarked for LO work. I have seen the new Mac build page and meta bug, and will do what I can (although myself, my wife and my three young girls 6, 4 and 2-months, all have a tummy bug right now :-( so i may not get a lot of time)
@Nicholas, very nice to see you back. :) I'm sorry for the illness, hope you all get well soon...
Adding self to CC if not already on
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.0.4 or later) https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT: - Update the version field - Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) - Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for your help! -- The LibreOffice QA Team This NEW Message was generated on: 2016-01-17
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.2.5 or 5.3.0 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug-20170306
This is still present
Well, this is in fact "fixed" by no icons having high-resolution options. They're all 256x256 icons now :) I'm creating a new bug for that
Dear Roman Eisele, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
This is fixed now on 7.5