Created attachment 113768 [details] This Zip file contains all of the information for confirmation of the defect This is a Works-for-Me-Not defect. The tracked change shown to the user is not how the tracked-change is saved in the resulting file, losing the change as it was observed when it was made. The defect in this report is confirmed in Libreoffice 4.3.1.2 and has appeared at least as far back as OpenOffice.org 2.4.3. NOTE: The Apache OpenOffice counterpart of this defect is reported as AOO Bugzilla issue 126139. This defect may also be related to i86812 here. The attached Zip file contains the following supporting materials: d141001-x0001.txt is this manifest and defect demonstration RCT-2014-09-10-1519-CrossCut-LibO-start.odt This is the initial file of simple nested lists. The file was created using entered text and the standard toolbar buttons to make indented numbered lists with outline 1,(a),i nesting. RCT-2014-09-10-1523-CrossCut-LibO-start.png This is a screen capture of the file -start.odt as it appears using LibreOffice 4.3.1.2 en_US x86 on Windows 8.1 Pro x64. Change Tracking is turned on and being shown. RCT-2014-09-10-1708-CrossCut-LibO-BC-select.png Screen capture of a selection of text from the end of item 2. BBBBBB into the beginning of item (a) CCCCCC. RCT-2014-09-10-1711-CrossCut-LibO-BC-delete.png Screen capture of the presentation after the DEL key is used. The list is as created, with the deleted CCC and BB positions shown with strike-through and a different color of text. RCT-2014-09-10-1712-CrossCut-LibO-BC-deleted.odt This is the file obtained when a Save As ... is performed after the change-tracked deletion shown in the -delete.png image. RCT-2014-09-10-1716-CrossCut-LibO-BC-committed.png Screen capture of the the -deleted.odt file re-opened in LibreOffice. The deletion is now shown quite differently compared to what was presented to the user at the time the deletion was made. This change is also shown immediately after the Save As ... is made, although that would not be noticed if the change-tracked deletion was not visible in the application window at the time. RCT-2014-09-13-1801-CrossCut-LibO-BC-accepted.png This illustrates the consequences of rejecting the altered tracked-change. Rejection does not restore the text as it was before the deletion operation was performed. NOTE: The defect
Reproduced with RCT-2014-09-10-1519-CrossCut-LibO-start.odt and going through the steps. Win 7 Pro 64-bit, LibO Version: 4.4.1.2 Build ID: 45e2de17089c24a1fa810c8f975a7171ba4cd432 Locale: fi_FI Ubuntu 14.10 64-bit Version: 4.4.1.2 Build ID: 40m0(Build:2) Locale: en_US
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.0.5 or 5.1.2 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT - Update the version field - Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) - Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for your help! -- The LibreOffice QA Team This NEW Message was generated on: 2016-04-16
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.2.7 or 5.3.3 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug-20170522
The Zip and the instructions were followed using LibreOffice_5.3.3_Win_x64.msi The test was performed on a Dell XPS 8500 running Microsoft Windows 10 Pro Version 1607. The test exhibits the exact same defect described in the Zip file. This defect is also presented as the star example, in section 4.7, Example: Works-For-Me-Not, in the published paper, "Tracked Changes: Navigating the Document-Format Anti-Pattern" that can be freely downloaded via the page at <http://nfoworks.org/rct/>.
Still the issue with 6.0+. Updated the title to include "numbering". This happens with customized numbering only like here where used with default style. Doesn't happen with heading styles customized with same numbering. Dennis, can you please upload other example you mentioned.
(In reply to Timur from comment #5) > Dennis, can you please upload other example you mentioned. The files I uploaded are the same as the example that is in the publication. (Sorry, had to create a new account for some reason.)
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Using Version: 6.0.5.2 (x64) Build ID: 54c8cbb85f300ac59db32fe8a675ff7683cd5a16 CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0; UI render: GL; Locale: en-US (en_US); Calc: CL There is no change. The defect appears as described in the original report. The insertion of list-item 3 (so the last is item 4) and the loss of sub-item heading (a) happens as soon as the document is saved -- the change shows in the still-open displayed document. Reloading is as modified by save. Side Comment: I do notice that the Attachment 113768 [details] does not appear to download properly using the Microsoft Edge browser on the latest Windows 10 update. The filename is some kind of mess. This might not be a bugs.documentfoundation.org defect though.
Fixed in Bug 119571. Now deletion shows immediately the correct format of the joined paragraphs, no need to save the file or change to Hide Changes mode for it. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 119571 ***