Bug 103240 - Modify toolbar state in Customize dialog
Summary: Modify toolbar state in Customize dialog
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: LibreOffice (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
5.3.0.0.alpha0+
Hardware: All All
: medium enhancement
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 107388 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks: Toolbars Customize-Dialog-Toolbars
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2016-10-15 13:49 UTC by Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired)
Modified: 2019-06-09 12:27 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired) 2016-10-15 13:49:46 UTC 
In Tools > Customize > Toolbars, the option to set the status of the toolbar isnt available. It should give drop down list access to the 'Visible' toolbar property available in the *WindowState.xcu files. Not sure if users should also be give access to the 'ContextSensitive' toolbar property.
Comment 1 Muhammet Kara 2016-12-07 11:21:48 UTC 
(In reply to Yousuf Philips (jay) from comment #0)
> In Tools > Customize > Toolbars, the option to set the status of the toolbar
> isnt available. It should give drop down list access to the 'Visible'
> toolbar property available in the *WindowState.xcu files. Not sure if users
> should also be give access to the 'ContextSensitive' toolbar property.

What if we add some radio buttons like the ones for Style? (Under them)
Style:        Icons      Icons & Text      Text
Visible:      True       False
Comment 2 Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired) 2016-12-08 16:41:40 UTC 
(In reply to Muhammet Kara from comment #1)
> What if we add some radio buttons like the ones for Style? (Under them)
> Style:        Icons      Icons & Text      Text
> Visible:      True       False

I guess radio buttons are fine, but is it not possible to also have a 'True (Contextual)' value as well?
Comment 3 Heiko Tietze 2017-07-20 12:21:31 UTC 
*** Bug 107388 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***