Download it now!
Bug 103854 - The Fields dialog, Cross References, does not have the option Number for footnotes
Summary: The Fields dialog, Cross References, does not have the option Number for foot...
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Writer (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
Inherited From OOo
Hardware: All All
: medium enhancement
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: Footnote-Endnote Fields-Cross-Reference
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2016-11-11 10:32 UTC by Ulrich Windl
Modified: 2019-02-05 18:19 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments
Sample document with footnote reference (13.92 KB, application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text)
2016-11-14 08:37 UTC, Ulrich Windl
Details
Cross-references dialog for headings (32.78 KB, image/png)
2016-11-15 07:13 UTC, Ulrich Windl
Details
Cross-reference dialog for footnotes (28.46 KB, image/png)
2016-11-15 07:17 UTC, Ulrich Windl
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ulrich Windl 2016-11-11 10:32:15 UTC
You can refer to a footnote by means like page number, but not by the number of the footnote itself (for headings you have (at least) both possibilities). Needed when having multiple footnotes per page.
Comment 1 Joel Madero 2016-11-12 04:48:53 UTC
Can you please describe this more ? I'm not following at all what you're hoping to achieve. If a sample document would help clarify please attach one.

Set to UNCONFIRMED once you clarify and add an attachment (if useful)
Comment 2 Ulrich Windl 2016-11-14 08:37:41 UTC
Created attachment 128739 [details]
Sample document with footnote reference

I was confused, thinking "reference" is the footnote text, when in fact it is the footnote number. Still, shouldn't there be a "Number" like for headings and a "Reference Text" as for headings, too?
Comment 3 Dieter 2016-11-14 22:14:06 UTC
I'm not sure, whether I grasp the problem or not. I think you wrote about the cross-references dialogue (Insert => Cross-reference => Cross-references). In this dialogue you can't select a footnote in the "insert reference to" field and you would like to have this possibility. Is it correct?
Comment 4 Ulrich Windl 2016-11-15 07:13:23 UTC
Created attachment 128756 [details]
Cross-references dialog for headings
Comment 5 Ulrich Windl 2016-11-15 07:17:20 UTC
Created attachment 128757 [details]
Cross-reference dialog for footnotes

The thing is confusion: If you want to insert the number of a heading, you'll have to select "number". But it you want to insert the number of a footnote, you'll have to select "reference". And if you select "reference" for a heading you'll get the text of the heading.
I'd wish both categories (headings and footnotes) behave more similar.
I also noted that you don't see the footnotes category in the dialog if there are no footnotes, but you see the headings category even if there are no headings as well.
Comment 6 Dieter 2016-11-15 13:50:05 UTC
I also think, that the dialogue is confusing. The improvement of the cross-reference dialogue is also discussed in Bug #96299.
Comment 7 QA Administrators 2017-05-31 10:51:01 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 8 Ulrich Windl 2017-05-31 10:58:02 UTC
The description is there for months!
Comment 9 Dieter 2017-05-31 12:08:17 UTC
So this might be a proposal: When you choose "Footnotes" as the type of reference the field "Insert reference to" should give the following possibilities:

Page
Chapter
Above/Below
As Page Style
Number

=> So the option "Reference" is hidden and the option "Number" is added. This would be consistence I think. Do you agree, Ulrich?

Changed status to NEW
Comment 10 Gellért Gyuris 2018-08-31 10:41:14 UTC
I'm not the reported, but I think: "Yes".