Description: LO Math can be improved to allowing Arabic mathematical expressions. To make them presented as expected, we can allowing 𞻰, 𞻱 placed as the middle line of a stacked fraction and being extended, also add an option to allow RTL direction. Steps to Reproduce: - Actual Results: - Expected Results: - Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_Arabic_mathematical_notation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Android 4.3; Mobile; rv:55.0) Gecko/55.0 Firefox/55.0
We can also allowing √ presented its mirror forms in RTL direction activated, otherwise (if a font does not support it) forced mirrored it on screen.
Volga: Is that available in MathML 2.0? In ODF 1.2 it is specified, that this is used. See http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.2/os/OpenDocument-v1.2-os-part1.html#__RefHeading__440362_826425813 and http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.2/os/OpenDocument-v1.2-os-part1.html#__RefHeading__1416212_253892949
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #2) > Volga: Is that available in MathML 2.0? In ODF 1.2 it is specified, that > this is used. See > http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.2/os/OpenDocument-v1.2-os-part1. > html#__RefHeading__440362_826425813 and > http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.2/os/OpenDocument-v1.2-os-part1. > html#__RefHeading__1416212_253892949 Sorry for late responce. W3C has a documentation for this. https://www.w3.org/TR/arabic-math/ According to the date this is published in 3 years later after MathML 2.0 published, so I think this is available in MML 2.0 and we can try it.
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #2) > Volga: Is that available in MathML 2.0? In ODF 1.2 it is specified, that > this is used. See > http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.2/os/OpenDocument-v1.2-os-part1. > html#__RefHeading__440362_826425813 and > http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.2/os/OpenDocument-v1.2-os-part1. > html#__RefHeading__1416212_253892949 Hi Regina, WDYT?
I think this is unnecessary, since TexMaths extension added support for XeLaTeX, which is able to produce such formulas.
(In reply to Volga from comment #5) > I think this is unnecessary, since TexMaths extension added support for > XeLaTeX, which is able to produce such formulas. Closing as RESOLVED WONTFIX