See Bug 111848 TABS are lost in transition (see slide 7 in examples) example attached to above bug
Reproduced with LO 5.4.0.3 (x64) Build ID: 92c2794a7c181ba4c1c5053618179937228ed1fb Threads CPU : 2; OS : Windows 6.1; UI Render : par défaut; Locale : fr-FR (fr_FR); Calc: CL only in PPTX format however.
Correct, the PPT version saves fine. I added it for comparison. The dilemma is that in the PPT version (even though many probably do not use it anymore) one has the problem of losing the autofit setting (see bug 111859)
The tab issue works fine in the Impress doc saved to PPT. However, the PPTX save does not view correctly in Powerpoint and also Impress.
Created attachment 142396 [details] ppt version of tab issue is good
Created attachment 142397 [details] pptx version of tab issue not good
Dear Elmar, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Still repro with attachment 135577 [details]. Already in 3.3.0 Version: 6.4.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) Build ID: d744838991594eebe27acc4c7d9fb4579d654853 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0; UI render: default; VCL: win; TinderBox: Win-x86_64@42, Branch:master, Time: 2019-09-29_05:12:00 Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded
Should be fixed with https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/2c14bbd5820f854be3a4b1c0f49b9d9afa05b08c Can you retest please?
Yep, verified Arch Linux 64-bit Version: 7.0.0.0.alpha1+ Build ID: e84d6f512fceb8b354b2d111193a9fd7d834acc5 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.6; UI render: default; VCL: kf5; Locale: en-US (fi_FI.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded Built on 11 May 2020
I am not sure what I am looking at, but when I display the two files in v7, they are still the same. This was reported so long ago. In the PPT version slides 7 and 8 display correctly. In the PPTX version they do not. I did also save the original ODP again into both versions using LO v7, and get exactly the same results I have also displayed both files in Office 365 and get the same results. I then opened the original ODP version in Office365 and saved it as a PPTX. You can see the results for yourself - slides 7, 8 do not even appear, and you can see how the formats of all the other slides have been changed. Bottom line: it this time with any version of LO, it is safe to say one should only consider saving to PPT.
Created attachment 160798 [details] original ODP version
Created attachment 160799 [details] as saved by Office365
Created attachment 160804 [details] Tabs identical for slide 7 in master Elmar: tabs look identical in this comparison, please comment. Arch Linux 64-bit Version: 7.0.0.0.alpha1+ Build ID: 6edcbde02520500812d969dd5bcba5ff68d59c58 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.6; UI render: default; VCL: kf5; Locale: en-US (fi_FI.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded Built on 13 May 2020
Very interesting. I saved the PPTX early yesterday morning after testing it in Windows MSO365. I then did an update in Windows (took almost all day - >1GB download) This morning I tried using both the online version of MS365 (the new name) and the full version in the VM. Hey presto, it looks like your screenshot! Other things resolved are that the fit-to-frame was working. Only quibble is on slide 8 where the rounded rectangle is slightly off. So, I guess this is just typical MS. Since introducing their "good enough" policy more than 20y ago, they are driven by delivery date concerns and things like following their own standards (which they change anyway when it suits them) are much lower on the list of priorities. I see that online MSO365 will not open ODP files. In the full version (I run Win10, Win7, XP in VM with equivalent versions of MSO because MS will often not read older versions of their own files, notably, MSProject, OneNote) I can open ODP, but it is still an embarrassing mess and would not be able to use it when facing the public. Kudos to you and team for doing a much better job than MS which really does not seem to care in spite of all the billions they make in profits. Very sad. Maybe if Bill had to spend some of his marketing-friendly charity billions by improving the quality of his product... A leopard does not change his spots. So I don't hold my breath. As far as I am concerned, you can close this as resolved.
(In reply to Elmar from comment #14) > Only quibble is on slide 8 where the rounded rectangle is slightly off. I noticed this as well. You can report it as a separate issue and add me to Cc.