Description: Seems to be a strange behavior when changing line thickness using Draw Functions. YouTube link: https://youtu.be/TaCEdr7bE5Q Steps to Reproduce: 1.Draw a Line 2.Use +/- buttons to change thickness Actual Results: Line thickness increase no matter what button I click on. Expected Results: Line thickness should increase or decrease properly. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: Yes Additional Info: Version: 6.4.3.2 Build ID: 1:6.4.3-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 5.4; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; Locale: es-AR (en_US.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded
*** Bug 133128 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Bisected to: author Szymon Kłos <szymon.klos@collabora.com> 2019-11-07 15:53:49 +0100 committer Szymon Kłos <szymon.klos@collabora.com> 2019-11-08 10:04:57 +0100 commit f7c751439d4616f43509301d71af92b13b576a84 (patch) tree 3db40e6d9a27b44d5b4e771658fd7ad101125c05 parent b94dd252730512f14d6939a250152b3e4c9e7583 (diff) jsdialog: consume .uno:LineWidth double value https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=f7c751439d4616f43509301d71af92b13b576a84 ~/win64-6.4 4e582258051b40db0c6b7795280740e1a7ac7007 is the first bad commit commit 4e582258051b40db0c6b7795280740e1a7ac7007 Author: Norbert Thiebaud <nthiebaud@gmail.com> Date: Fri Nov 8 01:33:25 2019 -0800 source f7c751439d4616f43509301d71af92b13b576a84 source f7c751439d4616f43509301d71af92b13b576a84 :040000 040000 47e6d51778a2d0e5953028641725b863cd3535d1 f235bed8a6a90a1faa373931272550998ba5a51d M instdir
Adding CC to Szymon Kłos
@Telesto, do you reproduce this on master? I think this is a duplicate of bug 132169 which is already fixed
Working as expected: Version: 7.0.0.0.alpha1+ (x64) Build ID: b587de60d4e6aa96238766272d94f1499b22f696 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3 Build 9600; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win; Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); UI: en-US Calc: CL *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 132169 ***
(In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #4) > @Telesto, do you reproduce this on master? I think this is a duplicate of > bug 132169 which is already fixed @Xisco / Szymon There is still a revert in gerrit https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/94673
(In reply to Telesto from comment #6) > (In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #4) > > @Telesto, do you reproduce this on master? I think this is a duplicate of > > bug 132169 which is already fixed > > @Xisco / Szymon > There is still a revert in gerrit > https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/94673 I'm going to revert my original patch as I changed the online and it is no longer needed