1. Open Writer 2. File->Export As->Export as PDF 3. Enable "Universal Accessibility (PDF/UA) 4. Export -> Accessibility Check dialog appears Expected: Any of the buttons in the dialog can be clicked Actual: Buttons not clickable Works with gen, doesn't work with gtk3. Problem since 1409159d6117d49e61fe5369f858239ff259fc1e
On the other hand with "gen" I can create multiple accessibility check dialogs by repeatedly pressing "export" in the underlying dialog, and then dismiss the underlying pdf dialog, at which point clicking ok or cancel in an accessibility check dialog will crash. Do we really want it modeless when it's a child of this modal pdf dialog? We could just have it modal (and a child of the pdf dialog instead of a child of the pdf dialog's parent) in this case and sidestep the question: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/143044
Caolán McNamara committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/5d9b8c367e70ac0a11f368ea702967ee4e0d5f06 tdf#152150 make AccessibilityCheckDialog modal when child of modal pdf dialog It will be available in 7.5.0. The patch should be included in the daily builds available at https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.
hopefully that's "good enough"
Confirmed with: Version: 7.5.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: a41c82407bbb73a4d87070326485ec4b4e954a65 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded Verified as fixed in trunk by Caolán's commit, with a build from today, thank you! :) Version: 7.5.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: c130063895c7a733ad121db1bf5fbceac38f6ad5 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded
(In reply to Caolán McNamara from comment #3) > hopefully that's "good enough" It is, thanks!