Bug 164273 - Comments are lost in fods files
Summary: Comments are lost in fods files
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 108244
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Calc (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
24.8.1.2 release
Hardware: All All
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: dataLoss
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2024-12-10 21:37 UTC by Ganton
Modified: 2025-01-23 06:16 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments
A file that already has lost three comments (28.56 KB, application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.spreadsheet-flat-xml)
2024-12-10 21:37 UTC, Ganton
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ganton 2024-12-10 21:37:38 UTC
Created attachment 198049 [details]
A file that already has lost three comments

Comments are lost in fods files

Steps to reproduce:

- Create a file and save it as a fods.
- Add a comment in A1.
- Save the file.
- Close the file.
- Open the same file again.
- Add a comment in B1.
- Save the file.
- Close the file.
- Open the same file again.
- Add a comment in C1.
- Save the file.
- Close the file.
- Open the same file again.
- Etc.

Doing those steps, you end up seeing that some of the comments have disappeared!

Data losses are very important. Thanks for Calc, the best spreadsheet software!
Comment 1 Regina Henschel 2024-12-11 17:52:35 UTC
It seems that the comment is deleted e.g. if you enter some content into a cell below, in the same column.
Comment 2 Aron Budea 2025-01-11 17:17:33 UTC
This seems to be a duplicate of bug 108244 to me.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 108244 ***
Comment 3 Ganton 2025-01-20 11:32:37 UTC
I don't think it's a duplicate of https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108244 , that bug is about ods files when being saved as fods files, but this bug is just about fods files.
Comment 4 Aron Budea 2025-01-23 06:16:26 UTC
That shouldn't make a difference.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 108244 ***