Created attachment 48176 [details] sample file According to ODF 1.2, the <style:header> element has a style:display attribute specifying whether the header or footer is displayed or not. The default value for this attribute is true. (See ODF 1.2 Part 1, 19.471) The attached file has ------------------------------------------------- <style:master-page style:name="tamp-0x899f740" style:page-layout-name="pl-default"> <style:header> <style:region-left><text:p><text:span>Page </text:span><text:page-number style:num-format="1"/></text:p> </style:region-left> <style:region-center><text:p><text:sheet-name/></text:p> </style:region-center> <style:region-right><text:p><text:span>Date: </text:span><text:date style:data-style-name="ND.0"/></text:p> </style:region-right> </style:header> <style:footer> <style:region-left><text:p><text:expression text:display="formula" text:formula="of:=[.$A$1]"/></text:p> </style:region-left> <style:region-center><text:p><text:span>Page </text:span><text:page-number style:num-format="1"/><text:span> of </text:span><text:page-count style:num-format="1"/></text:p> </style:region-center> <style:region-right><text:p><text:file-name text:display="name-and-extension"/></text:p> </style:region-right> </style:footer> </style:master-page> ------------------------------------------------- and although this is read by LibreOffice calc the header and footer are initially hidden.
[This is an automated message.] This bug was filed before the changes to Bugzilla on 2011-10-16. Thus it started right out as NEW without ever being explicitly confirmed. The bug is changed to state NEEDINFO for this reason. To move this bug from NEEDINFO back to NEW please check if the bug still persists with the 3.5.0 beta1 or beta2 prereleases. Details on how to test the 3.5.0 beta1 can be found at: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugHunting_Session_3.5.0.-1 more detail on this bulk operation: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/RFC-Operation-Spamzilla-tp3607474p3607474.html
I will not waste my time with checking whether this is still true in some recent unreleased version. I filed this report as a service to the LibreOffice user community. I am of course _not_ using LO myself. So if you don't care about these bugs, feel free to close this report.
Status of this bug report has been modified wrongly by a bulk change. No additional info is required, but someone with ODF knowledge to confirm reporter's complaint.
Thanks for bugreport http://odf-validator.rhcloud.com/ complains in this file only about this: unexpected attribute "gnm:GnmHAlign" So, nothing about header and footer. So, IMHO problem not in attached file. msOffice 2007 on Windows 7 opens this file with header and footer initially. Attached file created in gnumeric/1.10.17. So, we can do some additional experiments with Gnumeric when needed.
Regarding comment #4: http://odf-validator.rhcloud.com/ complains in this file only about unexpected attribute "gnm:GnmHAlign" only for OASIS ODF 1.2 (conforming), not for OASIS ODF 1.2 (extended conforming). OASIS ODF 1.2 allows for foreign attributes and foreign elements in the extended conforming class.
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (4.3.5 or later): https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) Thank you for your help! -- The LibreOffice QA Team
Confirmed. Win 7 Pro 64-bit Version: 4.5.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 784d069cc1d9f1d6e6a4e543a278376ab483d1eb TinderBox: Win-x86@62-TDF, Branch:MASTER, Time: 2015-01-25_23:07:36
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.0.5 or 5.1.0) https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for your help! -- The LibreOffice QA Team This NEW Message was generated on: 2016-02-21
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.2.5 or 5.3.0 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug-20170306
Neither header nor footer enabled in Version: 5.5.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: b56d1e294d838d4b3d0f237c81325a0d1a1cff83 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.1; UI render: default; TinderBox: Win-x86@39, Branch:master, Time: 2017-05-26_06:14:42 Locale: de-DE (de_DE); Calc: group
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Still reproducible in 版本:6.3.3.2 組建 ID:a64200df03143b798afd1ec74a12ab50359878ed CPU 執行緒:4; OS:Linux 5.2; UI 算繪:預設; VCL: kde5; 語言地區:zh-TW (zh_TW.UTF-8); UI語言:zh-TW Calc: threaded I noticed that even I enabled the header, added something in the middle block and removed another 2 blocks, and saved with this version, the style:header attribute became <style:header><text:p>Book1 <text:date style:data-style-name="N2" text:date-value="2019-11-23">0000/00/00</text:date></text:p></style:header><style:header-left style:display="false"/> No style:display="true" either.
This bug is still reproducible with: Version: 7.1.5.2 (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 85f04e9f809797b8199d13c421bd8a2b025d52b5 CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19043; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: pt-BR (pt_BR); UI: pt-BR Calc: threaded
This is likely fixed with commits for bug 121715 and bug 144940. Please test with a current daily build.
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #14) > This is likely fixed with commits for bug 121715 and bug 144940. Please test > with a current daily build. I checked the file with print preview and PDF export and did not see header or footer. Arch Linux 64-bit Version: 7.4.0.0.alpha0+ / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 110d3504c1f738a1d7f740cc212064dafa4fb224 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 (cairo+xcb) Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded Built on 10 December 2021
Dear Andreas J Guelzow, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug