Steps to reproduce: 1. Download sample presentation from <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=76397> from OOo bug #117872 2. create a copy of the odcument 3. Start presentations in Impress and from sample and in MX EXCEL or EXCEL Viewer from copy 4. Compare Expected: more or less identical Actual: 3D-look and "golden" color missing in headins In my screenshots you see additional differences what might have the same roots or might be different issues: - The background is much lighter - "chinese" letters shown instead of bulletw - Reported with Bug Submission Assistant - Firefox 6.0.2
Created attachment 51584 [details] Screenshots, see originla report
Created attachment 55907 [details] Left MS Office, right LibreOffice [Confirm] LibreOffice 3,5rc1
@Radek: Please feel free to reassign (or reset Assignee to default) if it’s not your area or if provided information is not sufficient. Please set Status to ASSIGNED if you accept this Bug.
(In reply to comment #2) > Created attachment 55907 [details] > Left MS Office, right LibreOffice > > [Confirm] LibreOffice 3,5rc1 Persists in 4.1.1.2
Tested on Win 7 64-bit 4.3.2.2 and dev build Version: 4.4.0.0.alpha1+ Build ID: ae218f4895082ea9fca8f414a332bcf47045ba8c TinderBox: Win-x86@39, Branch:master, Time: 2014-10-20_15:19:52 The only issues remaining are - no emboss for the headings - no shadow for the headings Please test.
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.1.5 or 5.2.1 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug-20160920
Dear Rainer Bielefeld Retired, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
I don't see in the original file the slide shown in jpg (second attachment). Following Buovjaga's comment, any update with last stable LO version 6.4.6?
Created attachment 168833 [details] Screenshot of the original document side by side in PP and Impress The golden titles color is okay, and the background is also looking good in: Version: 7.2.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) Build ID: 0f7008e91f45cf8e3cee6f372ce012b38a795e26 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3 Build 9600; UI render: default; VCL: win Locale: hu-HU (hu_HU); UI: en-US Calc: CL Still missing the Shadow font effect from the golden titles. Similar to bug #36229 which also has Shadow font effect.
Setting to NEW for the Shadow effect. Also correcting meta bug.
Dear Rainer Bielefeld Retired, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
The example file has these problems: (1) The shadow in the title is on the text. That is not implemented in LO. But LO could use the shadow of the text box as workaround in case the text box has no fill and no stroke. (2) The title uses 'Bevel' on the text. 'Bevel' is currently not implemented, neither for shapes nor for text and it cannot be expressed in ODF. (3) The yellow text has a gradient fill. Gradient for text is not implemented and cannot be expressed in ODF. But in case of gradient text an average color or the center color could be used as workaround. That would result in a similar color instead of the color White.