Created attachment 120369 [details] Odt-document for testing the export - look at the width between text and bullet. Open the attached *.odt-file. Shows a little bit text and the start of a list with a bullet. Export this with File → Export ... to a xhtml-file. Open this file with your browser. The bullet is on the left, directly followed by the text. Open the *.html-file for editing. Inside this file is shown "min-width:0,635cm;" This is a wrong decimal-separator and couldn't work. Change this to "min-width:0.635cm;" and the list would be shown in a better way. Seems this bug appears mostly together with bullets. Have tried to change the GUI from German to English - no effect. Have tried to change the local schema to English - no effect.
Created attachment 120370 [details] XHTML-file produced by LO while exporting - wrong decimal-separator for min-width
For me not reproducible with LO 5.0.3.2, Win 8.1
(In reply to A (Andy) from comment #2) > For me not reproducible with LO 5.0.3.2, Win 8.1 Could be I have to describe a little bit better: 1) Open the attached *.odt-file 2) Go to File → Export (not: File → Save As) 3) Select format XHTML 4) Save the file There will appear a file with *.html (better should have *.xhtml). Code is something like this: ... <span style="display:block;float:left;min-width:0,635cm;">•</span>One bullet. Decimalseparator for margin on left ... The min-width is set wrong here. If doing File → Save As the code is totally different. It produces ... <li/> <p style="margin-bottom: 0cm; line-height: 100%">One bullet. Decimalseparator for margin on left ... No min-width is set here. The format isn't the same. For exporting a book (like Base-Handbook) it is unusable.
Thanks for your reply. But unfortunately not reproducible for me. I get: "<span style="display:block;float:left;min-width:0.635cm;">•</span>One bullet. Decimalseparator for margin on left side should be 0.6<span class="T1">" Maybe a Linux only issue?
I have set back the user-profile here. Same behavior. I changed to the LO-Version of OpenSUSE - same behaviour. Changed to LO 4.1.6 (have installed many LO-versions parallel) - same behavior. My System: OpenSUSE 13.2 64bit rpm Linux. Seems we have to look for another person with Linux.
I get min-width:NaNcm; Setting to NEW. Ubuntu 15.10 64-bit Version: 5.0.2.2 Build ID: 00m0(Build:2) Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8)
Have tested a little bit more. The bug first appears with LO 4.0.0.3. Up to LO 3.6.7.2 the created code shows only '0' for min-with. So no min-with is defined at all. Seem this feature has been added with LO 4.0. I will set this one as "regression". Could be it is wrong to set this as "regression", because the feature doesn't exist before.
(In reply to robert from comment #7) > Seem this feature has been added with LO 4.0. I will set this one as > "regression". Could be it is wrong to set this as "regression", because the > feature doesn't exist before. Let's change to implementationError
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.2.5 or 5.3.0 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug-20170306
Bug still exists with LO 5.3.1.1, OpenSUSE 42.1 Leap, 64bit rpm Linux.
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Bug still exists with LO 6.0.5.2, OpenSUSE 42.3 Leap, 64bit rpm Linux.
Dear robert, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Bug still exists in LO 6.2.5.2 on OpenSUSE 15 64bit rpm Linux
