Bug 98287 - Mixing footnotes between sections leads to unwanted page break after the first footnote and pushes the second footnote to the next page
Summary: Mixing footnotes between sections leads to unwanted page break after the firs...
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Writer (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
Inherited From OOo
Hardware: All Linux (All)
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: Footnote-Endnote
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2016-03-01 00:09 UTC by Michael Fiedler
Modified: 2024-04-14 03:15 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments
test document (10.93 KB, application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text)
2016-03-01 00:09 UTC, Michael Fiedler
Details
observed behaviour (9.19 KB, application/pdf)
2016-03-01 00:10 UTC, Michael Fiedler
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Michael Fiedler 2016-03-01 00:09:25 UTC
Created attachment 123095 [details]
test document

Steps to reproduce:

1. Open the attached document. It contains the title at the beginning, followed by a two-column section for the text.
2. Add a footnote after the title. It is placed as expected below the first column of the two-column section.
3. Add a footnote after the text.


Expected behaviour:

The second footnote appears directly below the first footnote in the first column.


Observed behaviour:

A page break is inserted before the text. The first footnote appears on the first page, the text and the second footnote appear on the second page.


Environment:

Debian Linux 8.3 Jessie (x86)
LibreOffice 5.1.0.3-3 (from libreoffice.org)
LibreOffice 4.3.3-2+deb8u2 (from Debian)
Comment 1 Michael Fiedler 2016-03-01 00:10:00 UTC
Created attachment 123096 [details]
observed behaviour
Comment 2 Buovjaga 2016-03-17 12:05:42 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 54465 ***
Comment 3 Cor Nouws 2016-07-04 12:31:55 UTC
this is not a duplicate of bug 54465 - that describes where column size (or content, bug 58794) changes with footnotes.
This issue describes that a second footnote appears on a second page.
Comment 4 Cor Nouws 2016-07-04 12:37:01 UTC
Still an issue in Version: 5.3.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: cc503abb860c33a54a188640a5962dbdf7052284
CPU Threads: 2; OS Version: Linux 4.4; UI Render: default; 
TinderBox: Linux-rpm_deb-x86@71-TDF, Branch:master, Time: 2016-07-04_00:55:33
Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL.UTF-8)
The same problem in LO 3.3.4 > Inherited from OOo
Comment 5 Cor Nouws 2016-07-04 12:46:45 UTC
(In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #3)
> this is not a duplicate of bug 54465 - that describes where column size (or
> content, bug 58794) changes with footnotes.
> This issue describes that a second footnote appears on a second page.

Ah well, sort of the same as bug 54465 of course.
The special thing here is that only adding a footnote in the section with columns without adding one behind the title - before the section with columns, does not show the problem..
Comment 6 Cor Nouws 2016-07-04 12:50:38 UTC
(In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #5)
> (In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #3)
> > this is not a duplicate of bug 54465 - that describes where column size (or
> > content, bug 58794) changes with footnotes.
> > This issue describes that a second footnote appears on a second page.
> 
> Ah well, sort of the same as bug 54465 of course.
> The special thing here is that only adding a footnote in the section with
> columns without adding one behind the title - before the section with
> columns, does not show the problem..

So actually this issue shows both the problem from 54465 ánd the problem in the issue's summary :)
Comment 7 QA Administrators 2019-03-15 03:56:00 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 8 Babak Razmjoo 2019-03-27 12:32:40 UTC
This bug is still present in
Version: 6.2.2.2
Build ID: 2b840030fec2aae0fd2658d8d4f9548af4e3518d
CPU threads: 1; OS: Linux 5.0; UI render: default; VCL: x11; 
Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US
Calc: threaded
Comment 9 QA Administrators 2021-03-27 04:08:02 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 10 Alois Klotz 2022-04-14 07:40:22 UTC
This bug is still present in
Version: 7.3.2.2 (x64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 49f2b1bff42cfccbd8f788c8dc32c1c309559be0
CPU threads: 12; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19044; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win
Locale: de-DE (de_DE); UI: de-DE
Calc:
Comment 11 QA Administrators 2024-04-14 03:15:54 UTC
Dear Michael Fiedler,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.
 
If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug