- a sheet created in excel have autofilter active on a column. xlsx saved.
- xlsx loaded into calc
- the fields look filtered
- select the column
- paste into another sheet
- BUG: all the values are copied, even hidden ones
- change anything in the original table (fiddle with autofilter), then only the corect (visible) cells are copied
(comment to self: via TRf)
Set to NEEDINFO.
Change back to UNCONFIRMED after you have provided an example document from Excel.
Created attachment 125167 [details]
* load it
* select 'id' column
* add a new sheet
* hidden values should not be copied, but thy are
Reproduced with the file
Win 7 Pro 64-bit Version: 22.214.171.124.alpha1+
Build ID: f688acfdae00ebdd891737e533d54368810185e1
CPU Threads: 4; OS Version: Windows 6.1; UI Render: default;
TinderBox: Win-x86@62-merge-TDF, Branch:MASTER, Time: 2016-05-18_00:11:31
Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI)
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year.
There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present.
If you have time, please do the following:
Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice
(5.4.1 or 5.3.6 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/
If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and
your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior
If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave
a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System
Please DO NOT
Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not
appropriate in this case)
If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3)
2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo";
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword
Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa
Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!
Confirming that the bug is still present in v126.96.36.199.0+ Build ID: 1:5.4.1-1
It seems to be fixed in
Build ID: 1:6.1.5~rc1-2
Both full column and manual column selection copies only visible content.
(In reply to Peter Gervai from comment #7)
> It seems to be fixed in
> Version: 188.8.131.52
> Build ID: 1:6.1.5~rc1-2
> Both full column and manual column selection copies only visible content.
I can still reproduce with your steps in comment 2.
Arch Linux 64-bit
Build ID: adb08e892b37ea9e155abbdee4e0c9951a1d163b
CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.0; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3;
Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US
Built on 12 March 2019
Created attachment 157977 [details]
package containing xlsx + xls + ods
On Win10 with master sources updated today, I created an ods file with a simple autofilter, then I saved it to xls + xlsx format (the attachment contains the 3 files).
On each of the files, I selected filtered/not hidden lines and copy pasted them on a new sheet to compare number of lines pasted and selected, here are the results:
- ods -> OK
- xls -> OK
- xlsx -> KO
Let's increase importance since:
- it's easily reproduceable
- it concerns several envs (all?)
- not a corner case
- you may miss the problem when working on your file (so a bit "stealthy")
*** Bug 126505 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Copying from https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126505#c11
Problem seems to be that in the Excel file format there is no differentiation between filtered rows and manually hidden rows, there is just a hidden="true" attribute which on import does not result in a filtered row.
Can someone with Excel please create a short sample with an AutoFilter range where one row is filtered (which should not be included in a SUBTOTAL(9;...)) and one row is manually hidden (which should be included in a SUBTOTAL(9;...)) and attach it here? Thanks.
Created attachment 158053 [details]
Test on Excel 365
Eike: on Excel 365, I created a brand new file following example at the end of https://support.office.com/en-us/article/subtotal-function-7b027003-f060-4ade-9040-e478765b9939?ui=en-US&rs=en-US&ad=US.
Subtotal is 303 at the beginning => OK
I filtered data to filter out line with value = 10, subtotal is 293 => OK
I hid line with value 150, subtotal = 143 => ?? We expected 293 if I well understood the last comments.