Description: Searching for direct formatting like bold and italics simply doesn't work. Words and/or swathes of text are highlighted in the search results that have nothing to do with the search terms. This makes it impossible, for example, to replace a directly formatted BOLD character with soft-formatting (character styles instead of direct formatting). I can produce this Bug on both my Linux and Windows installation of LO. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Search for Bold or Italics (Hard-Formatting) Actual Results: Chaotic. Highlight words and text that have nothing to do with search term. Expected Results: If I search for Italics, for example, LO should highlight all italicized words or text strings. This is basic and essential functionality that works on every other word processor I use: Word and Softmaker Office among others. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0
Related Bug 106556 - Add functionality that highlights all directly formatted text In that thread I attached three screenshots: - Word - Show Direct Formatting Guides - Adobe InDesign - Find - Select Direct Formatting Characteristics - Adobe InDesign - Replace - Select Character Style Being able to see the direct formatting is needed. Being able to find and replace the direct formatting is needed.
Just wanted to add (or forgot to mention) that the search feature in LO is itself flaky. Working on an 800 page document. Sometimes LO finds text that I know is there, sometimes it doesn't. (Writing for Ebooks, I haven't been inserting chapter markers, but relay on search to navigate the document.)
(In reply to vermontpoet from comment #2) > Just wanted to add (or forgot to mention) that the search feature in LO is > itself flaky. Working on an 800 page document. Sometimes LO finds text that > I know is there, sometimes it doesn't. (Writing for Ebooks, I haven't been > inserting chapter markers, but relay on search to navigate the document.) Thank you for reporting the bug. Please attach a sample document, as this makes it easier for us to verify the bug. I have set the bug's status to 'NEEDINFO'. Please change it back to 'UNCONFIRMED' once the requested document is provided. (Please note that the attachment will be public, remove any sensitive information before attaching it. See https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/FAQ#How_can_I_eliminate_confidential_data_from_a_sample_document.3F for help on how to do so.)
Dear Bug Submitter, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping-20171030
Created attachment 137369 [details] Alternating hard/soft formatting... Attached a sample document. Am unable to search for character styles. LO doesn't have the ability to discriminate between hard formatting and character styles in its search functionality. And cannot replace one with the other. To be honest, I quit using LO about a year ago due to very basic issues like these---issues which developers (see my other Bug Reports) have either flatly stated they're not interested in fixing or features they resist or refuse to implement (involving style functionality in LO). Am now using Textmaker. Does everything I ask. Works beautifully for writing ebooks (makes extensive use of paragraph and character styles easy). If and when LO brings its "style" capabilities into the 21rst century, I'd love to use it again...
As of version 6.0.3.2, searching for direct character formatting seems to work fairly well. The rest of the OP's problem is probably related to lack of support for character style F&R (bug 78582).
Confirming that searching for direct character formatting is still working in: Version: 6.0.4.2 Build ID: 9b0d9b32d5dcda91d2f1a96dc04c645c450872bf CPU threads: 4; OS: Mac OS X 10.9.5; UI render: default; Locale: en-US (en.UTF-8); Calc: group However, it is totally broken in a recent master build: Version: 6.2.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: b292a27698e85fd9d60c03613c3b0c67835c4dc1 CPU threads: 4; OS: Mac OS X 10.9.5; UI render: default; TinderBox: MacOSX-x86_64@49-TDF, Branch:master, Time: 2018-06-06_23:25:55 Locale: en-US (en.UTF-8); Calc: group threaded First of all, the dialog for choosing character formatting to search for has changed, and now it's impossible to select just a font face without setting a specific size, sets it to 0 pt by default. Next, even if you choose some specific size, Writer continuously "finds" every paragraph in text although they are typeset in another font.
Created attachment 142808 [details] Document to reproduce the bug
Steps to reproduce: 1. Open attachment 142808 [details]. 2. Edit - Find & Replace - Format - Monomakh Unicode TT - 12 pt - OK - Find Next. Writer finds random strings which are not typeset with the chosen font. I could not reproduce that behaviour with a shorter document.
Dear vermontpoet, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Could not reproduce the problem in: Version: 6.3.0.0.beta1 Build ID: a187af327633f5f00363be5131bd21a13e0f1a7b CPU threads: 4; OS: Mac OS X 10.13.6; UI render: default; VCL: osx; Locale: en-US (en_RU.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded