Description: Setting Format in the CTRL+H search dialog affects the search performed by the CTRL+F dialog. This is similar to this former bug https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62601 but it isn't the same and it isn't fixed. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Write "This is happiness." in a document (and don't put any font effects on it). 2. Open the CTRL+H search dialog and in Other options -> Format -> Font Effects, set "Effects:" to "Capitals" 3. Close the search dialog and try to do a CTRL+F search for the string "happiness". Actual Results: "happiness" isn't found. Expected Results: "happiness" should be found. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: Yes Additional Info: Version: 6.0.1.1 Build ID: 1:6.0.1~rc1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1~lo1 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.4; UI render: default; VCL: gtk2; Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); Calc: group User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0
Reproduced as described. Version: 6.0.1.1 Build ID: 60bfb1526849283ce2491346ed2aa51c465abfe6 CPU threads: 4; OS: Mac OS X 10.12.6; UI render: default; Locale: en-GB (en_GB.UTF-8); Calc: group
Also reproduced in LibreOffice 3.3.0 OOO330m19 (Build:6) tag libreoffice-3.3.0.4
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Yep, this bug is still there in LO 6.2.0.3. Version: 6.2.0.3 Build ID: 98c6a8a1c6c7b144ce3cc729e34964b47ce25d62 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded
where are the duplicates of this issue?
Take a look at "See also: 62601 (https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62601)" There's a bunch of them there.
We may discuss if this is the bug at all. Also makes sense to keep setting from CTRL+H in CTRL+F. For me, bug is that after setting from CTRL+H is cleared, search still doesn't work.
Dear Eltomito, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
STR of comment 0 and result remain valid, settings made in the Find and Replace dialog are bleeding into the Find Bar search. Here it is a setting made to the Format -> Font Effects 'Case' values, when set they affect searches from the Find Bar. @Jim and thoughts on connectivity between the Find Bar and settings of the Find & Replace dialog? And which, if any, should affect the Find Bar & Sidebar Navigator 'Repeat search' actions...
UX gave direction in see also bug 72080 -- the Find Bar query should be as simple (basic) as possible with no bleed over from the Find & Replace dialog--the dialog being used for any more demanding searches across the modules.
A bit off topic, but in context of doing something with Search support. It would be nice to have ICU lib RegEx available to use from Find Bar ( bug 119200 ) but the consistency of no bleed over from the F&R dialog is better--as stated elsewhere no configuration of the Find Bar search that doesn't include visible control in the UI for it. So, can make a case that establishing a consolidated search deck for the Sidebar ( bug 95405 ) would be a good way to move forward. To expose the UI controls of the F&R dialog as content panels to fully configure the search. With a content panel to input the search strings. And content panels to hold results and reposition the canvas to focus at the results. Reuse the good stuff that Jim R. has been adding to SB Navigator deck. Would add that for a SB based Search it would be better UX to have ability to detach the deck from the SB, like current secondary <F5> Navigator. Or possibly to finally implement the SB framework needed ( bug 85905 ) to support detachable "tear away" SB decks. And eliminate the need for the <F5> Navigator duplicate, or any need to duplicate a new "Search" deck as for here. Instead just one of each but they could be torn away to float or to dock as user prefered.
*** Bug 157744 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***