Problems with Printing / PDF exporting in Impress:
With attached odp-file, there are problems with the two images/graphics.
They are simply gone, when I print the file or export the file to PDF. Please also have a look at the attached PDF file. Where the images are supposed to be, there is nothing.
I am reusing this slide for almost one year and I printed it a couple of times without noticing the problem. Hence, I assume that this is a new problem in a recent version of LO.
Side note: The slide was long time ago a PPT 2003 slide and, as far as I can remember, the sources of the images were SVGs imported to Powerpoint via Visio. Maybe, this helps to track the reason for the problem.
System: Ubuntu 10.10/Gnome and LibreOffice 3.2 PPA.
Created attachment 45821 [details]
Created attachment 45822 [details]
Additional remark: A friend of mine tested this issue with OpenOffice.org 3.3 and there was no problem with the images. It seems to be a LibreOffice related bug.
Could someone please have a look at this bug? Thank you very much!
As said, it is a LibreOffice only bug. There is no problem in OpenOffice.org.
I changed this bug to the importance high/major as it cannot be accepted that the user must check every single page of his/her PDF exports of documents or presentations before publishing them somewhere. I already received PDF documents from students where graphics were simply missing. Shouldn't be like that.
Confirmed in Ubuntu 11.04, LO Impress via the Terminal:
wget -c https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=45821 -O Lost-images.odp && unoconv --listener && unoconv -f pdf Lost-images.odp && acroread Lost-images.pdf
the pdf is missing some of the pictures in Adobe Reader.
Description: Ubuntu 11.04
apt-cache policy libreoffice-impress
*** 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu5 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty-updates/main i386 Packages
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main i386 Packages
apt-cache policy acroread
*** 9.4.2-0natty1 0
500 http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu/ natty/partner i386 Packages
apt-cache policy unoconv
*** 0.3-6 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/universe i386 Packages
NOT reproducible with "LibreOffice 3.4.4RC2 - WIN7 Home Premium (64bit) German UI [OOO340m1 (Build:402)]". Might be LINUX only? Please compare results in "Bug 41058 - PRINTING: impossible for particular Object", what might be a DUP
Problem reproducible. Both Bug 41058 and Bug 41059 look like dups of this bug as it is the same Linux only problem.
apt-cache policy libreoffice-impress
*** 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1~ppa1 0
500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/libreoffice/ppa/ubuntu/ oneiric/main i386 Packages
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric/main i386 Packages
apt-cache policy acroreadacroread:
*** 9.4.6~enu-0oneiric1 0
500 http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu/ oneiric/partner i386 Packages
CONFIRMED due to Comment 5, Comment 7
Please feel free to reassign (or reset Assignee to default) if it’s not your area or if provided information is not sufficient. Please set Status to ASSIGNED if you accept this Bug.
Created attachment 53575 [details]
tar.gz file with odt and pdf (generated by export directly to pdf...) note the missing photograph
The same read in presentation ODP bug #45821 happens to me in Writer with odp. exporting to PDF wipes out my photograph, but no the horizontal (small) lines that are images aswell. The same behaviour is observed when I print a paper copy.
buggy behavior reproducible with LO 188.8.131.52 (Win7 Home, 64bit)
Result: I only see a very much enlarged part of the picture in the PDF-Document.
I can confirm there is a bug doing Export as PDF (differ than file attached on comment 2), but no problem with printing.
Looks like very similar with Bug 55345 -> scaling problem
Tested on LO 184.108.40.206 (Win7 32bit)
Seems fixed in Version: 220.127.116.11
Build ID: 420m0(Build:1) on Ubuntu. Exporting to PDF shows all images. Could you please check with recent version.
Hi, I can confirm that the bug is fixed in
LibreOffice Version: 18.104.22.168
on Ubuntu 13.04
Mark it as RESOLVED-WORKSFORME. In case, you still encounter the problem, please feel free to reopen the bug.