I have problem with autofiltr in version 3,5 don't work when only one option was evailable and in autofiltr print page was bad display... Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/10.0.1
Created attachment 57122 [details] bug.ods Can you add some more details? What happens? What does you expect? Maybe even adding a test document and a detailed step by step description for us how to reproduce it?
Witam Please open a bug file and select john in auto filtr. If You select john nothing change in file and display all data. Pozdrawiam S. Wilk W dniu 15 lutego 2012 03:22 użytkownik <bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org> napisał: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46062 > > --- Comment #1 from Markus Mohrhard <markus.mohrhard@googlemail.com> 2012-02-14 18:22:26 PST --- > Can you add some more details? > > What happens? What does you expect? > > Maybe even adding a test document and a detailed step by step description for us how to reproduce it? > > -- > Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug.
I fail to reproduce this issue, tested using Mac OSX 10.9 with LibreOffice Version: 4.2.5.2 Build ID: 61cb170a04bb1f12e77c884eab9192be736ec5f5 @S.Wilk: please attach a sample document if you still can reproduce this behavior, using a more recent version of LibreOffice. Also provide some steps how to reproduce that behavior. Thanks. Kind regards, Joren
Confirmed in master. If a column contains only X and empty cells, empty cells cannot be hidden while filtering for X. However, if there are X, Y and empty cells, either X or Y will hide them.
Created attachment 103367 [details] Testcase demonstrating the problem This has recently come up on the users mailing list: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/msg39810.html For some reason my reply there doesn't show up in the archive, but I've worked up the attached example based on that. Using the filters in column B ("2 values + blanks"), which has more than one unique value in addition to some empty cells: - Filter on "aaa" shows only rows containing "aaa" (not "bbb" or empty) - Filter on "bbb" shows only rows containing "bbb" (not "aaa" or empty) - Filter on Empty shows only rows with empty cell (not "aaa" or "bbb") - Filter on All shows all rows ("aaa", "bbb" and empty) - Attempting to filter for "aaa" or "bbb" automatically selects All, and includes the empty cells. Using the filters in column C ("1 value + blanks"), which has only one unique value in addition to some empty cells: - Filter on Empty shows only rows with empty cell (not "aaa") - Filter on All shows all rows ("aaa" and empty) - Attempting to filter for "aaa" automatically selects All, and includes the empty cells. I've checked this on Windows using LO 4.0.4, which is admittedly quite old, but it looks like others are experiencing similar on more recent versions. The way the tick boxes work is a bit confusing in this regard, but it is possible to work around this by selecting "not empty" from the filters. It is also possible to choose "Standard Filter..." from the dropdown rather than using the tick boxes, and from there explicitly filter e.g. on "aaa" in column C ("1 value + blanks"). It appears that the tick boxes are intended as a quick was to set up basic filters, and don't accurately reflect more complex filters, but that's not particularly clear. Although the tick boxes don't look right after selecting "Not Empty", clicking "Standard Filter..." does show that the filter is currently set to show Not Empty values. Perhaps the tick boxes should all be greyed out if they can't accurately reflect the current filter? Even better, if (Empty) could be made one of the tick box options (without confusion with a possible value of "Empty" in a cell), it would be possible to select e.g. "aaa" and "bbb" without (Empty), or even "aaa" and (Empty) without "bbb".
For comparison: In Excel there is a tickbox marked '(blanks)' which filters values consisting solely of one or more spaces and empty rows. Adding this also solves bug [Bug 81577] FILTER: Can't switch a filter of if only one value except NULL is deleted.
Summary edited for clarity.
Setting to UNCONFIRMED. Note: REOPENED is for a bug that a developer says they fixed (thus the bug is put into RESOLVED -> FIXED) but a user can still see the problem on a version that should be fixed. For bugs never confirmed by a neutral third party the correct status is UNCONFIRMED. Thanks!
My test system: Bodhi 2 (built on Ubuntu 12.04) x64 LibreOffice 4.2.6 rc Confirmed (see notes below) New - confirmed Minor - can slow down professional quality work but will not prevent it Low - the workaround is pretty straight forward (select not empty) > Using the filters in column B ("2 values + blanks"), which has more than one > unique value in addition to some empty cells: > - Filter on "aaa" shows only rows containing "aaa" (not "bbb" or empty) > - Filter on "bbb" shows only rows containing "bbb" (not "aaa" or empty) > - Filter on Empty shows only rows with empty cell (not "aaa" or "bbb") > - Filter on All shows all rows ("aaa", "bbb" and empty) > - Attempting to filter for "aaa" or "bbb" automatically selects All, and > includes the empty cells. Assuming the last is "attempt to filter for "aaa" AND "bbb" not or (or works fine if you select just one as that's just step 1 and 2 above) > > Perhaps the tick boxes should all be greyed out if they can't accurately > reflect the current filter? Even better, if (Empty) could be made one of the > tick box options (without confusion with a possible value of "Empty" in a > cell), it would be possible to select e.g. "aaa" and "bbb" without (Empty), > or even "aaa" and (Empty) without "bbb". Not a fan of graying out anything, you do it once or twice and you learn how to workaround it. It's a pretty small issue but an issue none the less. Changing title to better reflect the issue as this isn't dependent on only one category existing, it's if you select all categories available (whether that is one or ten) then "all" is automatically ticked.
This bug is related to (but not the same as): "[Bug 81577] - FILTER: Can't switch a filter of if only one value except NULL". I agree with you that graying out is not a very elegant solution. I repeat the suggested solution from [Bug 81577] since that solves both bugs in one go: --- 1- Add 'Empty' to the ticklist, and remove it from the text selection 2- Make clear 'not empty' has been selected (a tick after the text will do) 3- Make 'not empty' and 'All' mark appropriate list boxes 4- Mark 'not empty' if all boxes except 'Empty' are marked FYI: Excel marks that are blank, and fields solely consisting of spaces as "(blanks)". Excel in fact trims all fields, so for the tick boxes 'a' is the same as ' a '. ---
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.0.4 or later) https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for your help! -- The LibreOffice QA Team This NEW Message was generated on: 2015-12-20
Set as WORKSFORME as I do not reproduce with the latest version. Please set back to NEW if you do reproduce. Thanks.
I retested LO 5.2.0.4, on OS X- Things are improved. Solution is close but not completely OK. I created a test file with in col A the following: --- Heading (empty) bbb (1 space) ccc (4 spaces) ddd --- Then I ceate an autofilter. Findings: 1- When I select 'not empty' the sheet shows all but row 2 (which is empty). The tickboxes however only show (empty) ticked. This is wrong. 2- In the ticklist there are 2 ticks showing exactly the same (for row 4 [1 space] and row 6 [4spaces]). This is not very clear. MS trims the values, so <spaces> become the same as <empty>. This wou;d solve the problem (at the expense of not being able to file on a string of a specified amount of spaces). Alternatively, the sting of spaces could be made viible by surrounding quotes in the ticklist.
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Created attachment 137320 [details] testfile for the 'spaces' issue
Created attachment 137321 [details] screenshot of remaining issue As cann be seen is this screenshot, there is no distinction between fields with 1 space and fields with more spaces (in this case 4 spaces.
As can be seen from the uploaded files the selection issues are resolved, but the discrimination between fiels containing a various amount of spaces is not.
Sorry, forgot environment: Version: 5.4.0.3 Build ID: 7556cbc6811c9d992f4064ab9287069087d7f62c CPU threads: 4; OS: Mac OS X 10.12.6; UI render: default; Locale: en-US (en_NL.UTF-8); Calc: group
LO: Version: 6.0.6.2 Build ID: 0c292870b25a325b5ed35f6b45599d2ea4458e77 CPU threads: 4; OS: Mac OS X 10.13.6; UI render: default; Locale: nl-NL (en_NL.UTF-8); Calc: group Re-tested- Last described problem about 'impossible to destinguish between cells with unequal amount of spaces is still a problem. The attachment "screenshot of remaining issue" shows the problem. The same is true if a cell contains aaa and another "aaa ". Apparently we don't want to go the MS Excel way of trimming all cell contents (in that case empty includes 'spaces') To slove this we either need to an indication on the length of the string (eg light grey square or a very thin line box around the string) or we need quotes around the string.
Dear wilkusz, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Re-tested: environment: Version: 6.3.3.2 Build ID: a64200df03143b798afd1ec74a12ab50359878ed CPU-threads: 4; Besturingssysteem: Mac OS X 10.15; UI-render: standaard; VCL: osx; Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL.UTF-8); UI-taal: nl-NL Calc: threaded Problems still not resolved: Using the original uploaded file from Mark Bourne (attachment 103367 [details]): 1- In AutoFilter column B select 'Not empty' Only box 'Empty' is autmatically ticked. This is wrong. It ahould be the only box NOT ticked, while all other boxes (in thes case aaa and bbb) should be ticked. Using testfile uploaded in attachment 137320 [details]: The problemn described in comment 20 still exists. The weird thing is that it should be real easy to resolve: either: - Indicate the string length by putting quates around the whole string, e.g. " " ", "aaa ", "aaa "," aaa ". - In indicate leading and trailing spaces with a grey block
Created attachment 170178 [details] Proposed solution using quotes
Is the proposed solution enough or should we add some kind of grey block/underlining etc.?
Selection list looks great as presented in attachment 170178 [details].
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/111837
Andreas Heinisch committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/135892e85c577c419c65b3607ce1ba788e0d10b2 tdf#46062 - Indicate hidden whitespaces using quotes It will be available in 7.2.0. The patch should be included in the daily builds available at https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.
Xisco Fauli committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/c46d3b5204077e5faae75f15711ec7c88f60f28d tdf#46062: sc: Add UItest It will be available in 7.2.0. The patch should be included in the daily builds available at https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.
Thx Xisco for the test! I missed it.