Created attachment 104811 [details] Test file DOC See test file. In Word the arrows have nice heads, while in LibO they are disconnected from the heads and don't even resemble Word-rendered ones.
Created attachment 104812 [details] How it should look
Created attachment 104813 [details] How it looks in LibO
I confirm issue under Win7 with all LibO releases I have from 3.3.3. to 4.3.1 and today's 4.4.0 master. same issue with OOo 3.3.0 and AOO 4.1 bug is inherited from OOo
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.0.1 or preferably 5.0.2.2 or later) https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for your help! -- The LibreOffice QA Team This NEW Message was generated on: 2015-10-14
bug is still present in LibO 5.1.0.0.alpha1+ Build ID: f830600ece806ec365a4839e79afabe183c5e36d TinderBox: Win-x86@62-merge-TDF, Branch:MASTER, Time: 2015-10-06_22:49:09 Locale: it-IT (it_IT)
*** Bug 105797 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Include data from bug 105797; the issue was tested up to today's MASTER build of LO and 5.3.0.3: * The issue also affects imports in PowerPoint (PPTX) [PowerPoints "open arrow" ("----->") gets imported as LibreOffice's "line arrow" ("----- >") with a gap between the corner of the ">" and the "---"]. Test case: attachment 130947 [details] * While LibreOffice's "line arrow" ("----- >") has a gap, LO's "short line arrow" does not - and could be used instead. Cf. attachment 130946 [details] (left: PowerPoint 2007, right LO 5.3.0.3) * The latter has an issue of its own (bug 82760). Namely, the line width of the head of "short line arrow" does not scale with the line width of the tail - such that one has something like: "====->"
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #7) > * The latter has an issue of its own (bug 82760). Namely, the line width of > the head of "short line arrow" does not scale with the line width of the > tail - such that one has something like: "====->" Should have been: bug 105796.
*** Bug 105796 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Created attachment 133035 [details] Test file PPTX with arrow Actually, it's not just arrows from MS Word, here is PPTX. I'll change the title.
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Still present in 6.0.4.2.
Created attachment 163812 [details] Test file DOC compared MSO 2016 LO 7.1+ attachment 104811 [details] DOC file still has slight differences on arrow head shape, maybe not even worth fixing. Same file as DOCX was explained in https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45479#c16. attachment 130947 [details] PPTX also is similar with small differences. attachment 133035 [details] PPTX also not fixed.
Created attachment 163813 [details] PPTX attachment 130947 [details] compared MSO LO (In reply to Timur from comment #13) > attachment 130947 [details] PPTX also is similar with small differences.
Dear Ruslan Kabatsayev, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
In LO 24.2.2.2 (X86_64/Linux), bug 45479's attachment 104811 [details] (.docx file) → comment 13 still looks like "————— >" instead of "—————→", namely as in the old screen shots: → attachment 163812 [details] (left Word, right LO) Likewise for others, e.g. attachment 163813 [details] – albeit the last → (stealth array) doesn't look as bad as the one in the Word document; it is still different, however, and there is still a small gap.