Description: Without Old Hungarian fonts or font part I couldn't make the UI for Old Hungarian script (defined in UNICODE) and I couldn't make a hard test with the hunspell for that scripts. Steps to Reproduce: 1.Accepting an invidual developer's font. 2. 3. Actual Results: When I would like typing Old Hungarian text (with settings RTL script named yet "None") just Tofus appear. PO file unable to appear without Tofus Expected Results: Must be appear Old Hungarian chars, no Tofus. Must be named this RTL area. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: The UNICODE block downloadable from: https://unicode.org/charts/PDF/U10C80.pdf
Created attachment 148972 [details] Testpage of the font
(In reply to Kovács Viktor from comment #1) > Created attachment 148972 [details] > Testpage of the font This document is the testpage of https://github.com/kende-fonts/kende-fonts/ project. The github project's io page is: https://kende-fonts.github.io/kende-fonts/ (Unfortunately I couldn't find the other fully UNICODE standard fonts for this area)
Created attachment 148974 [details] The downloadable zipped font about this project
cc: László Németh The bugreport is correct? If you agree with it, please switch it to NEW status.
cc: V Stuart Foote, László Németh I'm waiting for a long time for the DejaVu's op. Denis. And I think It wouldn't be changed for longer time.
cc:All I now discussed with an Old Hungarian-font specialist. I think, he would be develop better fonts, than me. If his github projectpage is made, (he have more font variant, we will pick of their repository) I drop a comment about his project.
Sorry Viktor, but completing the integration into DejaVu remains the most feasible way for LibreOffice to provide coverage of rovás in the "Old Hungarian" UCS block. Bundling specialized fonts to support the User Interface for a single Unicode block is not an effective way to do things. IMHO that specialized effort belongs bundled as an Extension that would include any hu-Hung (SH) rovás transliteration tools (bug 97406 c#28) along with any grammar & dictionary/spelling data. And likewise the same for hu-hung (CB) should that gain usage. Meaning--for its broader distribution, and its deployment by LibreOffice--DejaVu is a better choice. Your Kende, Maros, and Attila fonts with specialized coverage of the UCS block are not going to be helpful--they would not be built/bundled by any Linux distro, and would likely not be built into the projects official builds. Despite its limitations, absent the work needed to implement a User Interface in Hungarian rovás (bug 103405), the CTL handling of the script does detect the UCS block and correctly applies the ICU bidi filters to text runs for the range. It will also assign a "Hungarian Rovas" language tag if that is set as the default CTL. Also regards a supporting font Tamas needs to clarify the additional glyphs necessary to provide as PUA and where in the 20 remaining reserved spots of the "Old Hungarian" block they could be mapped and manipulated. We understand the argument that Unicode TC may have gotten it wrong during voting to release at UCS version 8.0--but working within the defined block is the only effective way to implement and then to make the case for expansion or relocation of the block.
*** Bug 113017 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 123203 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
cc: V Stuart Foote This fonts extended by required punctuation and quotation marks, as suggested by http://www.unicode.org/wg2/docs/n4268.pdf document. These glyphs are: U+0021 EXCLAMATION MARK U+002D HYPHEN - MINUS U+002E FULL STOP U+003A COLON U+201F DOUBLE HIGH-REVERSED-9 QUOTATION MARK U+204F REVERSED SEMICOLON U+2E2E REVERSED QUESTION MARK U+2E41 REVERSED COMMA U+2E42 DOUBLE LOW-REVERSED-9 QUOTATION MARK And, for backward compatibility with xkeyboards' Old Hungarian layout (that's between the e extras) DOUBLE QUOTATION MARK U+0022. It also implements a SPACE (U+0020).
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #7) > Sorry Viktor, but completing the integration into DejaVu remains the most > feasible way for LibreOffice to provide coverage of rovás in the "Old > Hungarian" UCS block. I understand. > Bundling specialized fonts to support the User Interface for a single > Unicode block is not an effective way to do things. I understand. > Meaning--for its broader distribution, and its deployment by > LibreOffice--DejaVu is a better choice. Your Kende, Maros, and Attila fonts > with specialized coverage of the UCS block are not going to be helpful--they > would not be built/bundled by any Linux distro, and would likely not be > built into the projects official builds. I understand. > Despite its limitations, absent the work needed to implement a User > Interface in Hungarian rovás (bug 103405), the CTL handling of the script > does detect the UCS block and correctly applies the ICU bidi filters to text > runs for the range. It will also assign a "Hungarian Rovas" language tag if > that is set as the default CTL. I understand. > Also regards a supporting font Tamas needs to clarify the additional glyphs > necessary to provide as PUA and where in the 20 remaining reserved spots of > the "Old Hungarian" block they could be mapped and manipulated. We > understand the argument that Unicode TC may have gotten it wrong during > voting to release at UCS version 8.0--but working within the defined block > is the only effective way to implement and then to make the case for > expansion or relocation of the block. I disagree with Tamás. I don't understand, what's the problem about "missing" 20 characters. The 108 characters are more, than for texts written in rovás required. Widely less characters are used. (See downloadable e-books from http://mek.oszk.hu page. Look it up in the "title" keyword Rovásírással.)
cc:Stuart http://mek.oszk.hu is the official homepage of the Hungarian National Library called "Országos Széchenyi Könyvtár" (OSZK.)
cc:Stuart Then, what I need to do? ( to close this bug, or not)