Bug 152652 - [META] Introduce style categories missing in Impress/Draw
Summary: [META] Introduce style categories missing in Impress/Draw
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Impress (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
Inherited From OOo
Hardware: All All
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 40871 137297 (view as bug list)
Depends on: 40047 128810 151264 152653 152654 152655
Blocks: ImpressDraw-Styles Unify-Across-Apps
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2022-12-23 14:09 UTC by Eyal Rozenberg
Modified: 2024-07-18 18:32 UTC (History)
13 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Eyal Rozenberg 2022-12-23 14:09:07 UTC 
A meta bug for requests/suggestions to introduce individual categories of styles in Impress.

This evolved out of several bugs about missing style-features, some of which coalesced into a bug about missing style categories (bug 40871).
Comment 1 Eyal Rozenberg 2022-12-23 14:22:05 UTC 
*** Bug 137297 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Eyal Rozenberg 2022-12-23 14:23:42 UTC 
*** Bug 40871 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Cor Nouws 2024-07-17 21:20:45 UTC 
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #0)
> A meta bug for requests/suggestions to introduce individual categories of
> styles in Impress.
In stead of using the [Meta] tag, closing duplicates, organizing is an option too? 
(confusing..) 

> This evolved out of several bugs about missing style-features, some of which
> coalesced into a bug about missing style categories (bug 40871).
Comment 4 Eyal Rozenberg 2024-07-17 22:20:36 UTC 
(In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #3)
> In stead of using the [Meta] tag, closing duplicates, organizing is an
> option too? 
> (confusing..) 

Well, this meta bug is the result of an attempt to get things organized, which was discussed on bug 40871. I do believe and hope the way things are right now is better-organized and easier to contextualize (especially if you only read the bugs not marked as dupes.)
Comment 5 Cor Nouws 2024-07-18 09:00:47 UTC 
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #4)
> Well, this meta bug is the result of an attempt to get things organized,
> which was discussed on bug 40871. I do believe and hope the way things are
> right now is better-organized and easier to contextualize (especially if you
> only read the bugs not marked as dupes.)

I think I expect either
-  "[META] Impress/Draw style bugs"
or
-  "Introduce style categories missing in Impress/Draw"

Now the title of this bugs combines both..
Comment 6 Mike Kaganski 2024-07-18 09:09:58 UTC 
(In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #5)

If I understand correctly, this is about something more specific than simply "Impress/Draw style bugs", but yet something that groups other specific bugs like "Introduce paragraph style to Impress/Draw", "Introduce character style to Impress/Draw", ... - so all these different style categories, each deserving an own leaf bug report to be tracked, deserve a meta like this. Of course, marking these specific leaf bugs as a *duplicate* of the parent meta would be wrong. But e.g. bug 40871 is about "character styles, and maybe paragraph, list styles?", so fits as a duplicate of this meta.
Comment 7 Eyal Rozenberg 2024-07-18 18:31:53 UTC 
(In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #5)
> Now the title of this bugs combines both..

1. As Mike said, this isn't a meta bug for all bugs with Impress/Draw styles.

2. I've removed the alias; do you like this better? Less clutter on the subject line?