Hi Telesto,
What's the point of this metabug ? Is it not enough to search for bugs with crash in summary? e.g. https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&columnlist=product%2Ccomponent%2Cpriority%2Cbug_severity%2Cop_sys%2Cbug_status%2Cassigned_to_realname%2Cresolution%2Cshort_desc%2Cchangeddate%2Cversion%2Ckeywords%2Ctag%2Cstatus_whiteboard%2Ccf_crashreport&list_id=1137278&query_format=advanced&resolution=---&short_desc=crash&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr

Telesto, can you reply to question from Comment 1 from 2020?
I think you should remove all this, as it can be simply found.

(In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #1)
> Hi Telesto,
> What's the point of this metabug ? Is it not enough to search for bugs with
> crash in summary?
(In reply to Timur from comment #5)
> Telesto, can you reply to question from Comment 1 from 2020?
> I think you should remove all this, as it can be simply found.
Two good reasons, in my opinion:
- Not all summaries mention "crash". At the time of writing, out of the 837 blockers (open or closed), ~27% don't have it;
- We now have Meta bugs in the blockers, so this acts as a node in the hierarchy.

(In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #6)
> - Not all summaries mention "crash". At the time of writing, out of the 837
> blockers (open or closed), ~27% don't have it;
Hm, to be fair, the vast majority of those would be caught by adding "assert" to the search. But the point still stands: some report a crash as "segfault" or "shuts down" or other terms.